He also denied there is an inherent tendency under capitalism to mistreat the workers, stating you dont rise to a position of authority that is reliable in a human society primarily by exploiting other people. Overall, Peterson appeared to see capitalism as the best, though imperfect, economic model. First by admitting we are in a deep mess. This largely contrasts Peterson's viewpoint who admittedly has never used that term to refer in any way to the associated conspiracy theory, but only to raise critique about cultural phenomena that are, according to him, directly associated with postmodern thought. Explain The Format And Rules Of A Formal Debate. - DEBATE JKW Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek: The debate. | by Ulysses Alvarez News About Presidential Debate - DEBATE JKW They are both concerned with more fundamental. Canad. consist just in searching for happiness, no matter how much we spiritualise [16] Similarly to Winston Churchill, he concluded that "capitalism is the worst economic system, except for all the others". interrupts himself to add "I will finish immediately" before finishing the joke. Web november 12, 2022 advertisement the nigerian factcheckers . The lesson of todays terrorism is that if there is a god then everything even blowing up hundreds of innocent bystanders is permitted to those who claim to act directly on behalf of god. with its constellation of thinkers. Debate Peterson-iek - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre He has not one, sudden cheer, iek shrugs off audience reaction, the University of Ljubljana and a second in psychoanalysis from University, lets hear it for psychoanalysis! Studebaker concludes that "Peterson didn't prepare. He wandered between the Paleolithic period and small business management, appearing to know as little about the former as the latter. El inters que suscit dicho encuentro descansa en gran parte en el carisma de sus protagonistas que con relativo xito han sabido posicionarse como rostros mediticos y . The time has come to step back and interpret it. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. "almost all ideas are wrong". iek & Peterson Debate - Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism (transcript Like I said before, I appreciated immensely that both men seemed pretty much on Both Zizek and Peterson transcend their titles, their disciplines, and the academy, just as this debate we hope will transcend purely economic questions by situating those in the frame of happiness of human flourishing itself. What happened to Peterson after his debate with Zizek? - Quora Hitler was one of the greatest storytellers of the 20th century. They needed enemies, needed combat, because in their solitudes, they had so little to offer. interesting because of it. self-reproducing nature, though he points out that communism had this At one point, he made a claim that human hierarchies are not determined by power because that would be too unstable a system, and a few in the crowd tittered. Did we really move too much in the direction of equality? Aquella vez me parecieron ms slidos los argumentos del primero. The same true for how today in Europe the anti-immigrant populists deal with the refugees. should have replied to defend communism. Last nights sold-out debate between Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek and Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson at the Sony Centre was pitched as a no-holds-barred throw down . In Peterson's defense, he did manage to stay much closer to the actual topic of the debate, while Zizek jumped wildly between a dizzying number of subjects. Studebaker wrote that "Zizek read a bizarre, meandering, canned speech which had very little to do with anything Peterson said or with the assigned topic. In the end Peterson-iek was less of a heavyweight boxing match than a WWE Grand Slam. I wanted to know that too! Chopin Nocturne No. If we learned anything from psychoanalysis, its that we humans are very creative in sabotaging our pursuit of happiness. Below is the transcript of zizek's introductory statement. Peterson was an expert on this subject, at least. Zizek called out for the necessity of addressing climate change while also focusing on such issues as Bernie Sanders, whom he called an old-fashioned moralist. Zizek sees Sanders as being unfairly portrayed as a radical. But market success is also not innocent and neutral as a regulatory of the social recognition of competencies. So, I dont accept any cheap optimism. [2] He asserted that it is wrong to perceive history only through a lens of class struggle, there is no exclusively "good" proletariat and "bad" bourgeoisie, such identity politics is prone to authoritarian manipulation, and that in his view people do not climb the social hierarchies only by taking advantage of others. The same goes also from godless, Stalinist Communists they are the ultimate proof of it. Im Zentrum der Dissertation steht die Typologisierung des homme fatal, des verhngnisvollen Verfhrers innerhalb der englischen Erzhlliteratur von der Romantik bis ins fin de sicle. In this short passage, which is dropped as quickly as it is picked up by Zizek, you have what's at the center of an entire intellectual life, a life devoted to formalizing a new and unorthodox. But precisely due to the marketing, [1], Around 3,000 people were in Meridian Hall in Toronto for the event. Tonight, "philosopher" Slavoj iek will debate "psychologist" Jordan Peterson in Toronto, ostensibly on the subject of Capitalism vs. Marxism. Aspen Ideas Festival: From the Barricades of the Culture Wars Transcript Transcripts 2018-09-25T15:05:00-04:00. Ideology, Logos & Belief with Transliminal Media . "If you have a good theory, forget about the reality. He is a conservative. In intellectual circles, the recent debate of the century between the Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson and Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek was a real heavyweight bout. That the debate will be live-streamed and more than 1,400 people have already dropped $14.95 for. If you look closely, you will say that state plays today a more important role precisely in the richest capitalist economics. The cause of problems which are, I claim, immanent to todays global capitalism, is projected onto an external intruder. It projects, or transposes, some immanent antagonism however you call it, ambiguity, tension of our social economic lives onto an external cause, in exactly the same way. [22], Der Spiegel concluded that iek won the debate clearly, describing Peterson as "vain enough to show up to an artillery charge with a pocket knife". In our daily lives, we pretend to desire things which we do not really desire, so that ultimately the worst thing that can happen is to get what we officially desire. A debate speech format follows the below pattern. more disjointed. Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. clear these are coherent thoughts from the same thinker. Slavoj Zizek Peterson Debate - DEBATGR He couldnt believe it. EL DEBATE DEL SIGLO: Slavoj iek y Jordan Peterson The event was billed as the debate of the century, The Rumble in the Realm of the Mind, and it did have the feel of a heavyweight boxing match: Jordan Peterson, local boy, against the slapdash Slovenian Slavoj iek, considering Happiness: Capitalism vs Marxism in Toronto. Pity Jordan Peterson. [2], Peterson has been seen as misusing the term postmodernism, referring to postmodern philosophy, as a stand-in term for the far-right and antisemitic Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory. Can we even imagine how the fragile balance of our earth functions and in what unpredictable ways geo-engineering can disturb it? iek and Peterson met in Toronto on Friday. 25 Debate quotes that show Jordan Peterson doesn't know what - Medium Jacques Lacan wrote something paradoxical but deeply true, that even if what a jealous husband claims his wife that she sleeps with other men is all true, his jealously is nonetheless pathological. Directly sharing your experience with our beloved may appear attractive, but what about sharing them with an agency without you even knowing it? This is why as many perspicuous philosophers clearly saw, evil is profoundly spiritual, in some sense more spiritual than goodness. Scientific data seems, to me at least, abundant enough. Error message: "The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your. Slavoj iek - Wikizero.com The debate, titled "Happiness: Marxism vs. Capitalism," pitted Jordan Peterson against Slavoj iek, two of the West's reigning public intellectuals. This page has been accessed 35,754 times. It can well secretly invert the standard renunciation accomplished to benefit others. Still, that criticism would be salutary for most "communists" He too finished his remarks with a critique of political correctness, which he described as the world of impotence that masks pure defeat. He sees the rejections of some systemic failures of capitalism onto external it, or in the effort to actualise our inner potentials. Rules for Life, as if there were such things. Most of the attacks on me are from left-liberals, he began, hoping that they would be turning in their graves even if they were still alive. The second reaction is global capitalism with a human face think about socially responsible corporate figures like Bill Gates and George Soros. In typical Zizek fashion, [16][17] iek was also critical of the multiculturalist liberals who espouse identity politics and that Western countries should rather fix the situation in immigrants' home countries than accept them. Equality can also mean and thats the equality I advocate creating the space for as many as possible individuals to develop their different potentials. Remember Pauls words from Galatians There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer male and female in Christ. Transcript of Zizek vs. Peterson Discussing - True Falsehoods Peterson opens with a 30-minutes speech where he criticizes the communist First, of all, the commons of external nature, threatened by pollution, global warming and so on. Live Commentary on the iek-Peterson Debate Current Affairs your opponent's ideas. They play the victim as much as their enemies. Transcripts | Jordan Peterson An archive of transcribed public lectures, interviews, podcasts, and YouTube videos. In the Nazi vision, their society is an organic whole of harmonic collaboration, so an external intruder is needed to account for divisions and antagonisms. wrote about commons before). Answer (1 of 5): Well, that 'debate' occurred in April of 2019. They were a vague and not particularly informed (by his own admission) reading of The Communist Manifesto. Zizek makes many interesting points. Regarding to the Peterson-Zizek debate as a whole, yes, I would recommend a listen. Regarding how the debate was receiving, judging from Twitter and some quick What I Learned at the 'Debate' Between Jordan Peterson and - Vice It has been said of the debate that "nothing is a greater waste of time." Tickets to the livestream are $14.95, and admission to the venue itself was running as high as $1,500. First, a brief introductory remark. The Petersoniek debate, officially titled Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism, was a debate between the Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson (a clinical psychologist and critic of Marxism) and the Slovenian philosopher Slavoj iek (a psychoanalyst and Hegelian) on the relationship between Marxism, capitalism, and happiness. Amidst the Peterson-Zizek Debate, We Should Still Think for Ourselves So, how to act? so that ultimately the worst thing that can happen is to get what we Are you also ready to affirm that Hitler was our enemy because his story was not heard? They do not have an answer to the real problems that face us: the environment and the rise of China as a successful capitalist state without democracy. So, how to react to this? I encourage you to watch the video or read the transcript Or, they were making wine in the usual way, then something went wrong with fermentation and so they began to produce champagne and so on. The Peterson-iek encounter was the ultra-rare case of a debate in 2019 that was perhaps too civil. One of the most stupid wisdoms and theyre mostly stupid is An enemy is just a story whose story you have not heard. The solution is not for the rich Western countries to receive all immigrants, but somehow to try to change the situation which creates massive waves of immigration, and we are completely in this. So, the term Cultural Marxism plays that of the Jewish plot in anti-Semitism. If you're curious, here's the timestamp for the joke. Community Video : Free Community : Free Download, Borrow and - Archive I mean primarily so called popularly neural-link, the direct link between our brain and digital machines, and then brains among themselves. [15][16] On the example of China, he tried to connect happiness, capitalism, and Marxism as well criticize China itself[16] and asserted that "less hierarchical, more egalitarian social structure would stand to produce great amounts of this auxiliary happiness-runoff". sticking to "his camp", but I feel like the resulting discussing ended up more [9] Billed by some as "the debate of the century",[2] the event had more tickets scalped than the Toronto Maple LeafsBoston Bruins playoff on the same day, and tickets sold on eBay for over $300. We are never just instruments of some higher cause. No. Transcripts | Jordan Peterson This is I think now comes the problematic part for some of you maybe the problem with political correctness. And sure, the level of the discussion might have been unappealing to all the [15], Later in the debate, iek agreed with Peterson's opening analysis and called for regulation and limitation of the market for capitalism to reduce the risk of natural and social disasters. What are two key areas a Release Train Engineer should focus on to support a successful PI. either, but points a problem with capitalism on what Marx called "commons" (I Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson debate on the concept of Happiness: Capitalism vs Marxism. The paper contains almost no references to any other texts, either by Marx or by other socialist thinkers. In this sense, the image of Donald Trump is also a fetish, the last thing a liberal sees before confronting actual social tensions. Peterson is his usual intensely-driven professorial self, which I personally By the end of his half-hour he had not mentioned the word happiness once. (PDF) Verfhrung - Kapitalismus - Academia.edu But, it is instantly clear how this self-denigration brings a profit of its own. causes (from Donald Trump to migrants). MeToo is all too often a genuine protest filtered through resentment. Is there, in todays United States, really too much equality? Not only are we not allowed cheap excuses for not doing our duty, duty itself should not serve as an excuse. Another summary of the Peterson/iek debate - Pharyngula Peterson and Zizek Debate | PDF | Capitalism | Karl Marx - Scribd iek is also defined, and has been for years, by his contempt for postmodern theory and, by extension, the more academic dimensions of political correctness. please join me in welcoming to the stage Doctor Slavoj iek and Doctor Jordan Peterson. One interesting point Zizek and Peterson both seemed to agree on is the opinion that humans arent strictly rational beings. I cleaned up the Zizek's second turn speaking, since that section seemed to contain many errors: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qs7mNIUsYt9kWcdO785ec_dEWmEHLo92yTso0CVtxNk/edit?usp=sharing. I always thought that neoliberalism is a fake term. My point is that it looked like Peterson wasn't interested in replaying that kind of thing especially, not with Zizek. Second yes, we should carry our burden and accept the suffering that goes with it. His thoughts on social constructionism vs evolutionary psychology (comparing By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. It has been said of the debate that " nothing is a greater waste of time ." Tickets to the livestream are $14.95, and admission to the venue itself was running as high as $1,500. divinity) that could impose meaning from above, and how it's impossible to go The recent debate between Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson lived up to the hype. Hundreds of millions raised from poverty into middle class existence. T. S. Eliot, the great conservative, wrote, quote what happens when a new work of art is created is something that happens simultaneously to all the work of art which preceded it. Born in France, Delphine Minoui lived in Tehran for 10 years to understand her grandparents country from the inside. Another issue is that it's hard to pin down what communism is By Tom Bartlett April 4, 2019 If you want tickets for the forthcoming showdown between Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek, which will be held later this month in Toronto, better act fast: There. thank you! Jacques Lacan:Seminars - No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis On April 19th, at the Sony Centre in Toronto, these two celebrated thinkers (and Big Think contributors) went head to head in a duel promisingly-dubbed Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism. It will be certain only it will be too late, and I am well aware of the temptation to engage in precipitous extrapolations. Peterson had said that people should seek meaning through personal responsibility and iek had said that happiness is pointless and delusional. (or both), this part is the most interesting. They can develop into a permanent obsession sustained by obstacles that demand to be overcome in short, into a properly metaphysical passion that preserves the biologically rhythm, like endlessly prolonging satisfaction in courtly love, engaging in different perversions and so on and so on. Now, let me be precise here Im well aware uncertain analysis and projections are in this domain. Zizek Vs Hannan: A 1950s Debate in 2021 | Neotenianos This is NOT a satire/meme sub. Which Way, Raskolnikov? iek v. Peterson - The California Review Remove him from his enemies and he is a very poor example of a very old thing the type of writer whom, from Samuel Smiles Self-Help to Eckhart Tolles The Power of Now, have promised simple answers to complex problems. Get counterintuitive, surprising, and impactful stories delivered to your inbox every Thursday. They argued whether capitalism or communism would be the best economic and political system. The Zizek-Peterson Debate In early 2019, after the occasional potshot at one another, it was announced that iek would debate Jordan Peterson in Toronto. the cold war, and it would seem to me that understanding the ideological roots A Debate Between Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek in Toronto | City Journal Below is the transcript of Zizeks introductory statement. Zizek expressed his agreement with Petersons critique of PC culture, pointing out that he is attacked as much by the Left that he supposedly represents as the right. So, I agree that human life of freedom and dignity does not consist just in searching for happiness, no matter how much we spiritualise it, or in the effort to actualise our inner potentials. Both rejected happiness as a primary goal for individuals and societies. towards disaster, maybe some catastrophes can shake us out of our ruts. If I visit your debate with Jordan Peterson it's on YouTube I felt you won that debate, and it's striking to me, the discussion between 1 hour 10 minutes and 1 hour 18 minutes. (Chinas success makes a joke out of the whole premise of the debate: the old-fashioned distinction between communism and capitalism.) Here is the original video extracted from https://www.jordanvsslavojdebate.com (livestream.com HLS source) using ffmpeg from Akamai CDN with the original audio and custom CC transcribed. He did voice support for free education and universal health care as necessary for people to reach their potentials and pointed to the economic success of China, a quasi-capitalist system without democracy. Cookie Notice ", "Snimka dvoboja titana ieka i Petersona", "HRT Je Jedina Televizija U Europi Koja Je Dobila Pravo Prikazati 'Debatu Stoljea': Evo kada moete pogledati filozofski dvoboj iek - Peterson", "Jordan Peterson vs Slavoj iek was more a performance than a debate", "Jordan Peterson i Slavoj iek: Debata stoljea ili precijenjeni show? Zizek Peterson Debate Transcript. It was in this opening argument that Zizek effectively won the debate to the extent it was a debate at all. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Zizek was hard to follow in his prepared statement, he becomes And I also think this may be critical to some of you there is a problem with capitalism here for the simple reasons that its managers not because of their evil nature, but thats the logic of capitalism care to extend self-reproduction and environmental consequences are simply not part of the game. Postmodernism: History and Diagnosis Transcript Dr. Jordan Peterson 2019-05-17T08:28:01-04:00. This is again not a moral reproach. So, its still yes, biologically conditioned sexuality, but it is if I may use this term transfunctionalised, it becomes a moment of a different cultural logic. Two Famous Academics, 3,000 Fans, $1,500 Tickets or a similar conservation organization. This I think is the true game changed. Does Donald Trump stand for traditional values? The truth lies outside in what we do. What if secretly they know she would kill her child again. Live Commentary on the iek-Peterson Debate | Current Affairs Really? El denominado "Debate del siglo" entre el filsofo y socilogo esloveno Slavoj iek y el psiclogo canadiense Jordan Peterson, fue uno de los eventos intelectuales de mayor trascendencia del ltimo tiempo. iek.uk - "If you have a good theory, forget about the reality." Elements of a formal debate. Course Hero is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university. Copyright 2007-2023 & BIG THINK, BIG THINK PLUS, SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by Freethink Media, Inc. All rights reserved.